Some time back someone I know told me that a neighbor of hers, an unmarried man in his early forties, was looking for a bride. As is common hereabouts she wanted to know if I knew anyone suitable. He had shunned marriage till then but had now agreed to it for the sake of his bedridden mother, she told me, as he wanted someone around to take care of her.
My shackles rose on hearing this. If he wants someone to take care of his mother he should very well do it himself, or get paid help, I angrily retorted. But a bride who arrives with gold, landed property and hard cash, will cook and serve him, as also nurse his mother in sickness is so much more better, right? Yeah, taking care of parents comes somewhere top in the list of reasons why men marry.
During my own youth what the families were most concerned about in the girl they chose for Chunnu, Munnu or Sonu was whether she was subservient enough to do their bidding without fuss. In other words her capacity to be a doormat mattered A LOT. That is AFTER her financial worth. Things have not changed much for the majority in the present, though we pretend loftily that it has. Taking care of the in-laws gets top priority still, to the exclusion of leading one’s own life. And even perceived neglect can result in violence and death as it has happened too often and to too many.
In the light of this, it is no wonder that the Supreme Court said this recently:
“Daughter-in-law should be treated as a family member and not housemaid, and she cannot be “thrown out of her matrimonial home at any time”, the Supreme Court has said, while expressing concern over instances of brides being burnt and tortured in the country” [From here]
It is bad enough that the apex court has had to spell it out to the populace. What troubles me even more is the reactions to this news item from those around me. The amusement and derision (from women) is unmistakable and the denial astounding and heartbreaking.
Yes, the lucky ones can afford to be amused by this news item, having never had to face situations of terror or helplessness at the hands of a strange family. They can choose to be derisive because they have not been threatened with violence or eviction from the matrimonial home for every imagined wrongdoing. They have not had to work long hours serving, not allowed to sit down even for long periods of time, been denied proper nourishment or beaten and/or had their spirit crushed.
In short when you are privileged, you can sit back and talk of ‘waiting’ for change to happen from ‘within’ as a better alternative to being imposed or suggested by an outside force, in this case, the court. After all you have nothing to lose while calmly waiting for one set of unknown and faceless people to change their rigid mindset towards another set however long it might take.
The million dollar question is, does change really happen from within (as claimed), ON ITS OWN without any prompting? Has.It.EVER?
Or has it been set in motion by those who question (unlike those who follow like sheep because ‘oh this is what we have been doing for centuries, this is culture, tradition and other blah blahs) the status quo and dare to go against established norms? (The established norm here being the unquestioned superiority of the man’s household and everyone living therein and total subservience of the woman who has entered the household as a bride)
Do institutions like judiciary have a role in planting those seeds of change or even speeding it up by observations, rulings?
Some believe not. I believe they definitely have.
In the meanwhile we can and should do whatever we can to change mindsets, teach women to be self reliant, not marry them off at a tender age, convince parents that marriage is not a be all and end all for their daughters (or sons for that matter), but standing on their own feet is, and oh yes, we can also stop making those assumptions about the life of others, that it is a matter too simple, of ‘adjustments’. No, it is not. It is a matter of broken bones, bruises, burns and numbing pain.
Empathy, much needed.
©Shail Mohan 2016.
wonderfully written.Change has never come on its OWN, without prompting.. sad truth that prevails in our society.
Thanks, Mersha. A nudge, a shove and at times a real hard kick in the rear are all needed in varying degrees for change to happen.
For the first part of your post, i too have a grudge
Most times change comes from Discontentment’s nudge
The Supreme Court orders
In reality it none bothers
But change does come — either in flood or sludge!
There’s that about change, flood or sludge 🙂
Totally agree with you. I know this isn’t the best way to go about it, but change in the law will most definitely give some legal respite to women who have nothing to fall back upon or no one to stand for them in the hour of need.
The society will take its own sweet time to move out of ita comfort zone but we can do what we can. Begin the change at home. Raise our sons and daughters as equals. Treat our DILs with respect.
Thank you, Varsh. That’s how I see it too. 🙂
Clearly, there is still a very long way to go.
A long way, yes.
My mother in law treats me the way she got treated by her mlaw. The law will just force her to treat me well but the sadism in her will never die. I too wait for the chance when I will dominate her. Here I should not repeat the same thing to my d-law (I don’t have sons but I am saying). This is what I meant that the change should come within not by force.
Your comment tells me that you have not understood my post fully, Saritha 🙂
It is difficult to change the way of thinking of the older generation. The next generation can change things by NOT continuing the oppression. That’s where the ‘change of mindset’ can actually become a reality. But, I don’t get what you mean by ‘I too wait for the chance when I will dominate her’.
Your MIL (like many others) might be a sadist, nothing you say or do might change her, not even what a court says. But if there is a law that she fears, she might not do you physical harm, or treat you like a maid (which is pretty bad considering how maids are treated in our country). Or if she does, you can go to court against her. And THAT is why what the court said is important, because there are so many young women who just want to be allowed to lead a life of safety and dignity.
I wonder if you have read these:
https://shailsnest.com/2012/10/19/the-evil-mothers-in-law/
https://shailsnest.com/2012/10/25/more-on-evil-mothers-in-law/
Maybe I didn’t put my words properly.. I meant I want to give her back what i received from her. I didn’t read those post..will read now.
Pingback: The need for change and DofG – Sep 2 | Sunshine and Rainbows!
Nice write up.
Well you gotta admit, Indian culture in general doesn’t like change and like to keep their old ways to keep their culture “pure”. And it’s hard for those who are mostly open to welcoming new ideas or want to forge their own path. But as always if you don’t conform to society you are labeled “bad” and will shit talked :/. It’s as if progression and personal development where one can discover their own selves is prohibited because of “culture and tradition”. Well how much of “culture and tradition” can one preserve in a rapidly progressing world? My mom was going on about that because my brother and I are not like a cousin’s kids who “traditionally Indian”-speak outstanding malayalam, very religious, top of everything compared to other kids..sing malayalam songs, dance..etc. Now mind you I love them because they seem to be a very chill family and admire my brother and I for us (as it seems) so I don’t really care about them being traditional or not ( if not and they have the typical malayalee mindset, then not sure if I should feel sorry for them?). But it’s annoying to be told that you have to be molded the same just to make a good image for others. I’m traditional in some ways, but it’s not “enough”. Yea I don’t speak malayalam fluently but can speak some, I go to church and pray for everyone’s well being although I don’t stick my nose in the Bible every freaking minute, and I can cook some Indian dishes but it needs to be to absolute perfection because the in laws need to be pleased and I need to be the perfect typical housewife. But it’s not good because it doesn’t conform to traditional standards. I realize though that you learn as you go when married (a lot of my cousins knew ZERO cooking pre-marriage but they learned with time, so why go bonkers over it?).
About marriage: It should be mere choice for both men and women, not a conformity. If one is open to marriage, it should be done when the couple is ready to get married, not what age they are. A lot plays into and rushing the girl/guy to get married because of “the others” is literally a crap shoot. Besides,rather than being happy for the couple, I realized that a lot of Indian marriages (not all) gives way for people start gossiping and talk behind others’ backs
Even in 21st century, it’s surprising that extreme close mindedness still exists, but what can we do? At least some people are wise enough to make a change where lives will be better for everyone (me included).
That last sentence is our hope 🙂