Tags
I am always impressed by the concern the stalwarts of society seem to have for women/girls and the innovative approach they take to prevent eve-teasing and sexual harassment. Never mind if that innovative approach is one that has been playing for centuries like a broken record, ‘Girls! Dress modestly!” which in the present contest means No jeans please we are Indians! Though this approach of taking control of what girls/women wear has not helped any as naturally the problem lies elsewhere, one has to appreciate their thick-skinned efforts which shamelessly falls back again and again on this tried, tested and failed method as the best way to protect their womenfolk. Dress modestly women/girls. Or else thou shall be pawed touched grabbed and worse raped! And we the society shall only be able to watch twiddling our thumbs for blind we are like Dhritharashtra, unable (or unwilling) to see where the real problem lies.
One simply feels like standing up and saying ‘Bravo!’ Take pride in this concern of society (which consists of men and women) for you and your safety, you the fair sex. Of course you will not be the fair sex for much longer, not if the cosmetic companies have their way. Don’t use your girl’s fairness cream they scream at all those un-fair in more ways than one sex, the males. What if the dainty damsel you want to be the Queen of your heart stamps her dainty (or not) foot and cries, “Un-Fair!!” on seeing your dark but handsome face?? So buy your own tube of the magic cream and beat the fair sex at their own game guys, they advise, while we get richer and richer at all your collective dumbness they snigger as an aside. Sigh, so much for the tall, dark and handsome concept. But I have digressed. Let’s get back to the dress code for women.
Recently I was at Bangalore for the admission of my niece to a prestigious college in the city. The college, the prestigious one I mean, we were told, had a strict dress code, no jeans and tees, only long tops or kurtis that reached down to your knees worn over salwars or churidars. It is another matter of course that while waiting in the corridor outside the college office I got the opportunity to correct a long held misconception of mine that the ‘knee’ was that part of the anatomy that connected your thighs to your lower leg and was commonly placed in all humans. Apparently it is not and varies from person to person, (Ha! Didn’t know that did you, ignoramuses?!) and can be anywhere between a few inches below your waist, to just below your derriere or half way down your thighs. Ahhh going to college has its benefits you see, even if it’s only as an accompanying parent or guardian. You learn new things. Sorry to have digressed again. One always likes to do the right thing and share knowledge gained and all that you know.
Relaxing over a cup of lemon tea the next day with that gentle glow of satisfaction brightening my day at an Aunt’s duty well done, I skimmed through the newspaper (The Times, Bangalore edition) when something caught my eye.
“Institutions are implementing strict dress codes for women around the country” Ahh there it was again, jeans bashing. This time it was the turn of four colleges in Kanpur to join the no-jeans bandwagon. Made me wonder what poor jeans had done to deserve such treatment. It wouldn’t surprise me if the whole lot of them shrank to one-fourth their size at the very first wash out of pure misery and shame at this atrocious treatment meted out to them. I mean they, the jeans were doing their duty, just like any other piece of clothing, covering up naked flesh although a wee bit too tightly at times. But then is that any reason to banish the poor things from college campuses?? Aww… Look at the sari blouses. Were they acting any different?? Too damn tight and revealing if you ask me. And what about that all revealing and sexy dress called ‘sari’ worn whichever way you please and exposing acres of naked flesh more in area than the acres of land in which these colleges stand??
While I was waiting in the corridor of the same prestigious college of Bangalore I saw this beautiful vision in sari walking down the corridor mobile in hand (mind you no one is allowed to use a mobile inside the college buildings, even visitors and here was a lecturer of the college flouting all rules blatantly. Sigh! Some people have all the luck!). Now, the vision was wearing a sari blouse whose neckline had taken to bungee jumping. Her midriff could accommodate a few football fields. But was anyone complaining?? Why don’t I hear anyone say, “Four colleges in the city ban wearing of sari in college to lessen the evil of eve-teasing.”?!
Oh no siree, no one would do that, not any of those stalwarts of society. If you wear a short top with your jeans with your midriff showing that is when it becomes obscene. But when you are in that all-Indian dress it is acceptable. Didn’t you even know that?? And then they say there is brain drain. Brain drain?? All the brains are right here making such all important decisions using such logic. I mean, look at how adroitly the real issue is sidestepped (once again, since time immemorial) and the responsibility of avoiding eve-teasing is passed on to the shoulders of girls/women when anyone with half a tea-spoon of intelligence knows that the trouble lies elsewhere. Do you mean to tell me all the Indian males were a paradigm of virtue till jeans and tees made an appearance?? Ahh the Decadent West! What would we do without you?? On whose shoulder could we have lain the blame??
My first experience of eve-teasing/harassment was when I was either eleven or twelve and I was in a long skirt and long blouse that modest all-Indian dress against which not even the worst of the culture vultures can raise a finger. Yet the wisdom of these ‘strict dress code-rs’ seem to suggest that eve-teasing is of recent origin and is tied inseparably to jeans and short tops. Oh puhleeze don’t insult the Indian male or underestimate him. They have always known about eve- teasing and sexual harassment long before the Decadent West made its appearance to corrupt the so called Innocent (my foot) East. Check with Draupadi what happened to her in the King’s court under his very nose. (Click here to read of that Maha Abuse) And then we need the Decadent West to teach us… pray, what new things??
The all important question of why it should be the responsibility of the girl/woman to prevent eve-teasing and sexual harassment and why the society cannot look the real reason in the eye and make it wilt is of course beyond my understanding. There is a saying in Mallu language that says, Mullu ilayil veenalum ila mullil veenaalum ilaykku thanne dosham (Whether the thorn falls on the leaf or the leaf falls on the thorn, the leaf is the one affected) Oh yeah?? Oh really??!!! So what do we do?? Let the thorns flourish among us and live a scared life trying to avoid them?? How about identifying the thorns and clearing them up so we have a thorn-free life?? Humans have cleared land everywhere for their own use. How about taking a little courage and banishing these thorns as well instead of asking the leaves to live in fear of them?? How about teaching these thorns some manners, some respect rather than spending the time teaching the leaves how to and what to wear?? How about letting the thorns and leaves mix with each other so that the sharpness of the thorns gets blunted and leaves are no longer any mystery to them to be poked, touched, grabbed or rubbed against?? Is that asking too much??
I have chosen to take a lighter and irreverent view. But please read this for a better understanding:
Why-a-ban-on-jeans-may-not-stop-street-sexual-harassment-of-women
“The all important question of why it should be the responsibility of the girl/woman to prevent eve-teasing and sexual harassment and why the society cannot look the real reason in the eye and make it wilt is of course beyond my understanding.”
It is always the responsibilty of the woman to take corrective measures because society (that matters) is composed of only men…
I’ve always thought the saree to be more sexy and revealing and yet nobody says anything because it is Indian…Jeans are not…Maybe men should be made to wear a saree to see how impractical it is…And why can men wear trousers and jeans? These articles of clothing are not Indian but have conveniently been made Indian by society (that matters)…
Me: Exactly! How come men wear Western attire?? And then they have the gall to ask women to wear ‘traditional’ attire.
It is about time that “society (that matters)… composed of only men…” is changed! In the earlier days men worked and brought home the money and the women took care of the house. Even that does not entitle them to be ‘the society that matters‘ because they are only half of it in every way!
he Decadent West made its appearance to corrupt the so called Innocent (my foot) East. Check with Draupadi what happened to her in the King’s court under his very nose. (Click here to read of that Maha Abuse) And then we need the Decadent West to teach us… pray, what new things??
Your anger is obvious in this post Shail, I loved the reminder of Draupadi! And Sita? … didn’t Ravan abduct her? And they were both in sarees.
I loved this post!
Me: I hate the way we Indians shift blame for everything on to the West. Everything is the West’s fault. That is the problem with us. Never can take responsibility for our actions. Even in ordinary life if you notice, everyone is in a rush to palm off something or other on the next person! Sita and Draupadi were all victims, in saris to boot! Unless the mindset of the people changeS, wearing any dress will result in the same scenario being played and replayed. This ‘eve-teasing’ and harassment is not going to vanish even if we walk around clothed in gunny sacks from head to toe.
Thanks IHM!
good one Shail. aptly put. 🙂
Me: Thanks Shilpa! 🙂
when a group of women were groped in mangalore.One of the spokesman of the monkey brigade had the cheek to comment that the women were skimmpily dressed and that provoked the men to do what they did.The fault lies not in the hemlines of women but in their(men) minds.
great post.
my first time here.will come back for more.
Me; Indeed the fault wholly lies in thei(men) minds and not in the hemlines of women! Rightly said Gazal. I always wonder why robbers are arrested. Aren’t they tempted by the display of riches in the houses of the well off?? Why do we teach children to curb their temptation and not allow them to take their pick from the toys that tempt them in the toy shop?? Only when it somes to these degenerates who grope women on the streets, the blame is on the victim and the way she is dressed! I bet none of them will even bother to get a pair of decent dress for those who roam half naked due to poverty. Instead they gang up to teach skimpily clad women a lesson!
Welcome to my page Gazal and thanks for leaving a comment. Keep visiting.
What less ( not else) I can expect from you on this post. Inspite of so much talks on ban jeans or salwar etc, we could see the salwar and churidhars made their way even in village of south india.Its good.
One always likes to do the right thing and share knowledge gained and all that you know. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Me: That the salwars and churidars have been accepted grudgingly is in itself something to rejoice about. Life for women isn’t the same as before. Why is it expected that we roam around wearing five and a half metres of cloth?? This insistence on sari coming from men is indeed rich, especially since all of them have conveniently switched to Western wear!! 😛
My first ‘experience’ of eve teasing happened when I was a kid too so no the dress has nothing to do with it..
there are pervs who will find ANY excuse to do what they want..
this BS regarding dress is crap!
loved the post 🙂
Me: Why is it so difficult to the ‘dress-coders’ to understand this little point that it is not the way a woman dresses that is the problem?? May be a whack on their heads will solve the problem! *seriously considers the issue* 😛
u r right! a truly emasculated society which blames the apparel for a vice!
and very true- that a culture which finds saree blouse respectable should bash the jeans!
cultural conditioning, what else. stereotyped thinkng – –
Me: “blames apparel for a vice” How succinctly put! Conditioning is the bane of us!
Welcome to my page and thanks for leaving a comment.
In a country where we have had lot of women we admire
and boasts of queens who have ruled over empire
it is a pity now that they are caught in a quagmire
over something as simple as their attire
Me: Indeed Govind, it should be the least of our worries, what someone wears or doesn’t.
So “Jai Ho’ to jeans,right,Shail 😀 ???
I totally agree banning wearing jeans will not solve anything. The problem lies much deeper than that.Its in the mindset of people and that thought process needs to change and get broader.Its the filth that breeds in the minds of people that need to be banned and plucked out.
Me; Rather ‘Jai ho’ to whatever one wants to wear Deeps 🙂 At the moment jeans seems to be at the receiving end. Actually this whole thing mystifies me. In the 70s, I wore trousers to college with tops shorter than what girls are being asked to wear today. That’s more than 30 years back. And there was no hue and cry the way there is nowadays.
You are right, It is the mindset and one despairs wondering when THAT will change!!
It is the pervertion in the minds of both the eve teasers and the moral police men. I just don’t understand that how some one wearing a pair of jeans is considered vulgar or revealing. May be that it is a western attire. A woman reveals much more while wearing a saree or a ghagra choli than the one wearing jeans and T shirt. But that does not mean that the men are at liberty to pounce on a woman revealing even an inch of her skin. The solution lies in catching and punishing the culprits and not passing strictures on the victims.
Me: Your comment says it all Balvinder.
“… that does not mean that the men are at liberty to pounce on a woman revealing even an inch of her skin” Wonder when this lesson will sink into the minds of the general populace?!!
This country is going the Muthalik way! Why not blindfold the men who eve tease, takes less effort
Me: Wow what an idea Madamji! I tell you, you are a genius. This is the best solution, the simplest and easiest. 😛
Why? Because males aren’t used to take responsability for their actions, that’s why – it’s always someone else’s fault, in this case it’s the female’s fault. Why can’t you see that, too, Shail? LOL
Whoohoo to you!
Me: You can say that again sister mine! I have met very very few men who would take responsibility for their actions. Can you imagine, forgetting to switch on the indicator light in a car making a turn is because the children in the back-seat made a racket! Lol, it is too funny! I cannot even think of giving such a lame excuse if I find myself in the same situation.
Woohoo back at ya Mel! 🙂 Nice to see you here after a long time
Well-said!!And I liked Phoenixritu’s ‘solution’ a lot.
Me: I have read your post written after reading this one. 🙂 Yeah Ritu’s solution rocks totally! 😉
This sucks. Just to argue, if we were even to accept that it was a woman’s job to manage a man’s thoughts and actions for him, what could she do? Just stop existing? Spontaneously self destruct?
Was shocked by this in the supposed cradle of feminism. Dangerous threat to male students, apparently!
http://www.salon.com/2014/10/01/north_dakota_high_school_eliminates_dangerous_threat_to_male_students_yoga_pants/